In re Taxable Mun. Bond Securities Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff did not have RICO standing in part because he “ha[d] not alleged lost profits”
• noting as illustrative example that defendant had failed to allege lost profits, and therefore had not pled injury
• noting that RICO does not protect an “intangible property interest”
• finding contention of “lost ‘opportunity’ to obtain a NIFA loan by itself [was] too speculative to constitute an injury”
• stating in the context of RICO standing that \[a plaintiff's] contention that he has sustained a lost `opportunity' to obtain a [state-subsidized] loan by itself is too speculative to constitute an injury\
• stating in the context of RICO standing that “[a plaintiffs] contention that he has sustained a lost ‘opportunity’ to obtain a [state-subsidized] loan by itself is too speculative to constitute an injury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).