In re T.A.
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 4173
Syllabus
Criminal law—Juvenile law—App.R. 26(B)—A person adjudicated a juvenile delinquent may not reopen his or her direct appeal from the adjudication based on a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel under App.R. 26(B)—Although App.R. 26(B) does not apply to a direct appeal from a juvenile adjudication, the appellant may avail himself or herself of the pre-rule procedures described in State v. Murnahan—Certified question answered in the negative and court of appeals' judgment affirmed.
Judges: O'Connor, C.J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. MurnahanOhio Supreme Court· 1992-02-19· cited 753×
- In re C.S.Ohio Supreme Court· 2007-09-27· cited 170×
- In re AndersonOhio Supreme Court· 2001-06-13· cited 145×
- Whitelock v. Gilbane Building Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1993-06-30· cited 136×
- State v. Morgan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-09-13· cited 111×
- State v. Hand (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-08-25· cited 110×
- State v. Maddox (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-03-16· cited 99×
- State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court· 2008-09-18· cited 91×
- State ex rel. Savarese v. Buckeye Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 67×
- Armstrong v. John R. Jurgensen Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 2013-06-04· cited 35×
- State ex rel. Law Office of Montgomery County Public Defender v. RosencransOhio Supreme Court· 2006-11-22· cited 24×
- State v. Pettus (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-10-13· cited 12×
- In re T.A.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-06· cited 5×
- In re L.N.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.