In Re Swarts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• disciplinary proceeding where the Kansas Supreme Court determined, inter alia, the responding attorney did not violate KRPC 4.3
• “When one undertakes the responsibility of prosecution we must view his or her conduct by an enhanced standard.” [citing United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 25, 84 L. Ed. 2d 1, 105 S. Ct. 1038 (1985)]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).