In re Swain

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In the absence of a proper showing of an unexpected and superior result over the disclosure of the prior art, no invention is involved in a result obtained by experimentation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pfizer, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2007-03-22· cited 295×
• In re Pollack
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1949-06-28· cited 4×
• Application of Leroy P. Wahl and Lynn C. Adolphson
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1965-06-17· cited 1×
• Pfizer v. Apotex (Formerly Known as Torpharm)
  Federal Circuit· 2007-03-22

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• In re Berger
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1944-06-26· cited 7×