In Re Sutherland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting debtor&s argument that restitution debt was dischargeable under section 1328(a)(3) because surety was required by state law to reimburse victim of debtor&s embezzlement, and thus victim had already been made whole
• “The longer the process to confirmation [under Chapter 13], the greater the harm to the creditors and the increase in adequate protection issues and problems for the creditors, the debtor, and the Court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Branch v. Hill, Holliday, Connors, Cosmopoulos, Inc. Advertising (In Re Bank of New England Corp.)
  D. Massachusetts· 1994-04-12· cited 12×
• In Re Bryer
  D. Maine· 1998-12-07· cited 5×
• In Re Cockings
  E.D. Arkansas· 1994-08-30· cited 3×
• In Re: Gravel
  Second Circuit· 2021-08-02