In re Supple Minors for Family Meeting
Citations
- 123 La. 939
- 49 So. 648
- 1909 La. LEXIS 805
Syllabus
<p>Minors and Tutorship — Family Meeting— Appointment op Tutrix.</p> <p>Where the proceedings of a family meeting called for the purpose of recommending whether the surviving mother, who had remarried, should be appointed tutrix of her minor children, included two recommendations, the first advising her appointment as tutrix on giving bond and security, and the second advising her appointment as tutrix for the custody of the children, and that the property of the minors should continue to be administered by a certain trust company already appointed by the court for that purpose, held, that the judge was without power to strike out the last recommendation as surplusage, and to homologate the first recommendation as the advice of the family meeting, and should' have refused to homologate the proceedings, .and should have ordered another family meeting to be convoked.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Guardian and Ward, Dec. Dig. § 9.,*]</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding plaintiff had no standing on their claim for injunctive relief where she did not plead that she still maintained the policy at issue
- “If there is no conflict, the law of the District of Columbia applies by default.”
- “[A] statement or omission is material if a significant number of unsophisticated consumers would find that information important in determining a course of action.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Land
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.