· 5/2/2001
In Re Sunstates Corp. Shareholder Litigation
Citations
- 788 A.2d 530
- 2001 Del. Ch. LEXIS 63
- 2001 WL 491173
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “to pierce the corporate veil based on an agency or ‘alter ego’ theory, ‘the corporation must be a sham and exist for no other purpose than as a vehicle for fraud’” (quoting Wallace, 752 A.2d at 1184)
- finding “no basis” to pierce the corporate veil where “entities [were] engaged in substantial business operations”
- declining to apply implied covenant in context of preferred stock agreement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lamb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.