Skip to main content
· 8/15/2005

In Re Sujeet Kumar

Citations

  • 418 F.3d 1361
  • 76 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1048
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 17215
  • 2005 WL 1939792

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a new ground of rejection exists when the Board relies on new fact findings which had not been previously advanced by the examiner about an existing prior art reference
  • “In calculating the overlapping values, the Board found facts not found by the examiner regarding the differences between the prior art and the claimed invention, which in fairness required an opportunity for response.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Archer, Dyk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.