· 3/15/2010
In Re Subpoena to Goldberg
Citations
- 693 F. Supp. 2d 81
- 2010 WL 893661
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that Zerilli “articulated a three-part test to determine the appropriate balance between the litigant’s interest in the information and the public’s interest,” composed of centrality, exhaustion, and party-non-party status
- noting resolution of motion to quash governed by Rules 26 and 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
- requiring litigant to seek out other sources that could “likely” provide requested information
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: John M. Facciola
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.