Skip to main content
· 3/15/2010

In Re Subpoena to Goldberg

Citations

  • 693 F. Supp. 2d 81
  • 2010 WL 893661

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Zerilli “articulated a three-part test to determine the appropriate balance between the litigant’s interest in the information and the public’s interest,” composed of centrality, exhaustion, and party-non-party status
  • noting resolution of motion to quash governed by Rules 26 and 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
  • requiring litigant to seek out other sources that could “likely” provide requested information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John M. Facciola

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.