In Re Subpoena Duces Tecum to AOL, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a subpoena imposes an undue burden on a party when [it] is overbroad”
• finding a subpoena “overbroad because it [did] not limit the [documents] requested to those containing subject matter relevant to the underlying action”
• quashing an overbroad subpoena that was not reasonably limited in scope
• “the statutory language of the [SCA] does not include an exception for the disclosure of electronic communications pursuant to civil discovery subpoenas.”
• “When a non-party claims that a subpoena is burdensome and oppressive, the non-party must support its claim by showing how production would be burdensome.”
• “A subpoena imposes an undue burden on a party when a subpoena is overbroad.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).