In re Subdivision Mann v. Township of Forks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[c]ollective action in support of an individual boycott is not the same as a group boycott”
• noting that antitrust injury is 4 “mandatory” to show antitrust standing, which is required for all Sherman Act claims by 5 individuals
• noting that Congress did not intend to afford a remedy to everyone injured by an antitrust violation simply on a showing of causation, and enumerating five factors governing antitrust standing
• “To plead a Sherman Act claim, a private 1 standing.”
• “The first factor — antitrust injury — is mandatory”
• describing antitrust injury as “mandatory” for antitrust standing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).