In re Stuart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• lawyer violated DR 1-102(a)(4), (5) and (7) when, in response to a justice’s question about the whereabouts of a witness, the lawyer falsely indicated that he had no knowledge of her whereabouts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Peters
  S.D. New York· 2008-04-10· cited 7×
• In Re Stuart
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-02-07· cited 6×
• Matter of Kurtzrock
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2020-12-30· cited 3×
• Cruz v. Integrated Health Administrative Services, Inc.
  New York Supreme Court· 2017-04-21· cited 2×
• Matter of Rain
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2018-06-28· cited 1×
• Matter of Heffernan
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2020-03-11

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• People v. Walters
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1998-06-08· cited 47×