In re Strickland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “current monthly income” under § 101(10A) means the amount of income earned during the six months, regardless of the date of receipt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Miller v. United States (In re Miller)
  Tenth Circuit· 2014-10-08· cited 1×
• UST - WY v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Wyoming - Cheyenne
  Tenth Circuit· 2014-10-08

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A.
  Supreme Court· 2011-01-11· cited 410×
• Hamilton v. Lanning
  Supreme Court· 2010-06-07· cited 365×
• In Re Robrock
  D. Minnesota· 2010-05-21· cited 8×
• In Re Bernard
  D. Massachusetts· 2008-11-20· cited 6×
• eCast Settlement Corp. v. Washburn (In Re Washburn)
  Eighth Circuit· 2009-08-28· cited 5×
• In Re Cleaver
  D. New Mexico· 2010-03-22· cited 4×
• In Re Katz
  C.D. California· 2011-05-20· cited 2×