In Re Stockbridge Properties I, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[t]he court finds that the most appropriate method for valuing the outparcels is fair market value,” but deducting reasonable holding and market costs
• rejecting use of hybrid approach in favor of a sales comparison approach
• valuation of undeveloped land for the purposes of confirming a plan
• “Even though the court values property by looking to the secured creditor’s options regarding, disposition, the creditor is not entitled to a valuation based on a sale of the property under conditions imposed , by the creditor that would substantially diminish the amount realized.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States Ex Rel. Farmers Home Administration v. Arnold & Baker Farms (In Re Arnold & Baker Farms)
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-12-30· cited 77×
• In Re Melgar Enterprises, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 1993-02-22· cited 18×
• PNC Bank, National Ass'n v. Park Forest Development Corp. (In Re Park Forest Development Corp.)
  N.D. Georgia· 1996-03-26· cited 13×
• First American Bank of Virginia v. Monica Road Associates (In Re Monica Road Associates)
  E.D. Virginia· 1992-11-17· cited 7×
• Farm Credit of Florida, ACA v. Sugarleaf Timber, LLC
  M.D. Florida· 2015-03-23· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Peerman
  W.D. Texas· 1989-12-22· cited 10×
• In Re Raylin Development Co.
  W.D. Texas· 1989-06-30· cited 9×
• In Re El Paso Truck Center, Inc.
  W.D. Texas· 1991-06-21· cited 5×