In re Stitt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the “liberal pleading policy has its limits,” and “a 2 pleader may assert contradictory statements of fact only when legitimately in doubt about the 3 facts in question”
• “bankrupt’s status at time of adjudication governs”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chicago Bank of Commerce v. Carter
  Eighth Circuit· 1932-11-17· cited 40×
• In Re Wengerd
  Sixth Circuit· 2011-06-15· cited 28×
• In re Ann Arbor Mach. Corp.
  Sixth Circuit· 1921-07-01· cited 19×
• Jones v. Burgess (In Re Burgess)
  M.D. Tennessee· 1979-12-05· cited 15×
• In Re Lynch
  E.D. Kentucky· 1995-08-22· cited 12×
• Herzig v. Commercial State Bank
  Tenth Circuit· 1937-08-21· cited 8×
• Hyman v. Meifert
  Sixth Circuit· 1932-04-15· cited 5×
• In re Moore
  E.D. Michigan· 1921-08-15· cited 4×
• In re Johnston
  S.D. Ohio· 1968-01-30· cited 1×
• In re: James Wengerd v.
  Sixth Circuit· 2011-06-15

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re Stewart
  Sixth Circuit· 1910-05-03· cited 35×
• Duryea Power Co. v. Sternbergh
  Supreme Court· 1910-11-14· cited 32×
• In re Holden
  Sixth Circuit· 1913-03-04· cited 26×
• In re National Grocer Co.
  Sixth Circuit· 1910-06-07· cited 11×
• In re Baker
  Sixth Circuit· 1910-05-03· cited 10×
• In re Wood
  Sixth Circuit· 1918-02-12· cited 7×
• In re Crum
  N.D. Ohio· 1913-10-27· cited 6×
• In re Berman
  N.D. Ohio· 1905-11-17· cited 5×
• In re Radcliffe
  N.D. Ohio· 1917-05-05· cited 5×