In Re Stewart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[B]ecause ‘reaffirmation agreements are not favored,’ strict compliance with § 524(c) is mandated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Golladay
  C.D. Illinois· 2008-07-15· cited 10×
• In Re Engles
  N.D. Oklahoma· 2008-02-27· cited 8×
• In re Eastep
  W.D. Oklahoma· 2017-01-06· cited 4×
• In Re Bellano
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2011-08-11· cited 3×
• In Re Smith
  W.D. Michigan· 2012-03-08· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Norwest Bank Worthington v. Ahlers
  Supreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 992×
• Jamo v. Katahdin Federal Credit Union
  First Circuit· 2002-03-26· cited 148×
• In Re Eccleston
  N.D. New York· 1986-12-22· cited 24×
• In Re Gruber
  N.D. Ohio· 1982-06-21· cited 18×
• In Re Brinkman
  N.D. Indiana· 1991-01-15· cited 18×
• In Re Collins
  D. Connecticut· 2000-01-13· cited 17×
• In Re Whitmer
  S.D. Ohio· 1992-06-25· cited 15×
• In Re Burgett
  S.D. Ohio· 1988-12-27· cited 11×
• In Re Reed
  N.D. Ohio· 1995-01-17· cited 5×