in Re Steven and Shyla Lipsky and Alisa Rich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining further that TCPA dictates that courts should review evidence concerning whether movants’ statements were defamatory and thus actionable in second step of TCPA analysis
• explaining further that TCPA dictates that courts should review evidence concerning whether movants’ statements were defamatory and thus actionable in second step of TCPA analysis
• “Proving falsity in a public-figure defamation case is the plaintiff’s burden of proof.”
• court noted that if the Legislature had meant to require a trial court to “hold,” rather than merely “set,” a hearing within 30 days on a particular motion, it “knew how to say so,” as it had done in other previously-enacted statutes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).