In re Stephens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The references show that the art is highly advanced, as would be expected for one so ancient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.
  D. South Carolina· 1977-07-29· cited 42×
• S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1985-03-15· cited 11×
• In re Sichert
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1977-12-15· cited 10×
• In re Strahilevitz
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1982-01-15· cited 9×
• In re Colianni
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1977-09-15· cited 7×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Application of Newsome W. Gay
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1962-11-14· cited 121×
• In re Armbruster
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1975-03-27· cited 20×
• Application of Francis J. Honn and Willard M. Sims
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1966-08-04· cited 12×
• Application of Roger A. Long
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1966-11-23· cited 5×