In Re Stephen E. Wright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[a]s a statutory requirement, enablement is a question of law that we review de novo; however we review for clear error any underlying facts found ... in rendering [the] enablement determination.”
• “To be enabling, the spec- ification of a patent must teach [a PHOSITA] how to make and use the full scope of the claimed invention without ‘un- due experimentation.’” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).