Skip to main content
· 9/2/2020

In re Statman

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 4285

Syllabus

CONTEMPT: The evidence was insufficient to support the contemnors' convictions for indirect criminal contempt where the contemnors had not committed any affirmative acts to constitute contempt, and where the convictions were based solely on the conduct of another and the contemnors' status as designated trial attorneys in several cases: the contemnors could not be held vicariously liable for another's contempt.

Judges: Crouse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.