In re State Warrants
Citations
- 6 S.D. 518
- 62 N.W. 101
- 1895 S.D. LEXIS 140
Syllabus
<p>1. Appropriations from the assessed but uncollected revenues of the state, and the issuance of warrants in pursuance thereof to defray current expenses, is not the incurring of an indebtedness, within Const, art. 13, sec. 2, which provides that to make public improvements, or to meet extraordinary expenses, or deficits or failure in revenue, the state may contract debts never to exceed, with previous debts, $100,000, and no greater indebtedness shall be incurred, except to repel invasion, suppress insurrection, or defend the state or United States in war.</p> <p>2. Revenues of the state, assessed and in process of collection, are to be considered as constructively in the treasury, and may be appropriated and treated as though actually there.</p> <p>3. The fact that warrants issued in anticipation of such assessed revenues draw interest does not make the issuance of the warrants an incurring of an indebtedness to the extent of such interest, within Const, art. 13 sec. 2, where such warrants, with respect to interest, are not different from other warrants which may properly be drawn and issued.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.</p>
Judges: Corson, Fuller, Kellam, Supreme
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- McFarland v. BarronSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1969-02-04· cited 34×
- National Life Insurance v. MeadSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1900-03-02· cited 30×
- State ex rel. Rankin v. State Board of ExaminersMontana Supreme Court· 1921-05-02· cited 30×
- State Budget Commission v. LebusCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1932-06-24· cited 24×
- State Ex Rel. Pierce v. SlusherOregon Supreme Court· 1926-03-09· cited 19×
- Associated General Contractors of South Dakota, Inc. v. SchreinerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-11-25· cited 18×
- State Bond Com'n v. ALL TAXPAYERSSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1987-08-11· cited 13×
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. McGrawWashington Supreme Court· 1895-12-26· cited 12×
- Western Town-Lot Co. v. LaneSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1895-04-20· cited 12×
- State Ex Rel. Phillips v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1940-02-20· cited 11×
- State ex rel. Black v. EaglesonIdaho Supreme Court· 1919-06-11· cited 9×
- In re Rural Credits LawSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1917-05-07· cited 8×
- Darling v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1898-06-03· cited 7×
- Stanley v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Iowa· 1998-07-01· cited 5×
- People Ex Rel. Capron v. NelsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1931-04-30· cited 5×
- Walling v. LummisSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1902-12-31· cited 3×
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Faulk CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1902-04-01· cited 2×
- Opinion No. 74-230 (1974) Ag Part II of Part IIOklahoma Attorney General Reports· 1974-10-02
- Opinion No. Oag 28-82, (1982)Wisconsin Attorney General Reports· 1982-03-17
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named In re State Warrants
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.