In Re State Police Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “the determination of whether the plaintiffs’ expectations of privacy were reasonable depends on proof of the absence of notice.”
• stating that “plaintiffs have established as a genuine issue whether any of the notification methods employed by defendants informed anyone that the State Police automatically recorded all outgoing as well as incoming calls”
• \it remains a question of fact whether defendants listened to protected conversations while reviewing tapes for other purposes\
• “[Wjhere conversations consist of privileged communications between clients and their attorneys, an expectation of privacy is reasonable.”
• “[T]he determination of whether the plaintiffs’ expectations of privacy were reasonable depends on proof of the absence of notice.”
• “it remains a question of fact whether defendants listened to protected conversations while reviewing tapes for other purposes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).