In Re Star 3 Transportation, Inc., Star 3 Brokerage, LLC and Ronald Brown v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a defendant may challenge the discretionary aspects of a sentence when the defendant enters an open guilty plea
• “all courts of common pleas have statewide subject matter jurisdiction in cases arising under the Crimes Code”
• “the claim that the sentence was the result of bias and prejudice, and not individualized, also constitutes a substantial question”
• “[A] claim of excessiveness, in conjunction with a - 12 - J-S25010-25 claim that the court did not consider the relevant sentencing criteria and/or considered improper factors, poses a substantial question.”
• “Under [Section] 9721, the court has discretion to impose sentences consecutively or concurrently[.]” (quoting Commonwealth v. Moury, 992 A.2d 162, 171 (Pa. Super. 2010)). “The unambiguous language of [18 Pa.C.S.A. §] 1321(a)[ (renumbered as the identical Section 9721(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).