In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report No. 2007-5

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding defendant’s confession was prompted not by unlawful detention but by lawful discovery of untainted, incriminating evidence
• concluding defendant = s confession was prompted not by unlawful detention but by lawful discovery of untainted, incriminating evidence
• observing that prosecutorial questioning about a defendant’s failure to contact the police after giving a statement, in order to correct the statement or provide additional information, is improper under the strictures of Doyle
• stating, in dictum, that presenting claim on appeal that is directly contrary to express claim at trial may constitute induced error
• reviewing court will consider unpreserved constitutional claim raised by defendant for first time on appeal only if trial court record pertaining to claim is adequate for appellate review
• requiring defendant \to take the necessary steps to sustain [his] burden of providing an adequate record for appellate review\ [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).