Skip to main content

In re Stallworth

Citations

  • 208 N.J. 182
  • 26 A.3d 1059
  • 32 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 179
  • 2011 N.J. LEXIS 477

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that agency decisions are subject to reversal if they are “arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable”
  • explaining that an agency's action is arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable when the record does not contain substantial evidence supporting a finding upon which the agency's decision is based
  • recognizing implicit public interest in public discipline system of justice and stating “there must be fairness and generally proportionate discipline imposed for similar offenses by public employers and responsibility in one agency to assure such fairness and proportionality”
  • finding bypass of progressive discipline appropriate after State Trooper assaulted a prisoner, rendering the Trooper unable to function as a law enforcement officer
  • requiring our examination of \whether the record contains substantial evidence to support the findings on which the agency based its action\
  • first citing Henry v. Rahway State Prison, 81 N.J. 571, 579 (1980); and then citing In re Carter, 191 N.J. 474, 482 (2007)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named In re Stallworth

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.