Skip to main content
· 10/12/2005

Federal Case

Citations

  • 425 F.3d 1116
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 21954

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the proposed medical monitoring class presented a “myriad of individual issues”
  • reversing certification of a 23(b)(2) medical monitoring class where the need for monitoring and treatment depended on individual circumstances and medical histories
  • stating certification under Rule 23(b)(2) is appropriate only when the primary relief sought is injunctive or declaratory relief
  • overruling district court’s order certifying a class because the district court did not conduct a sufficient conflicts of law analysis prior to certifying the class
  • We' believe it prudent not to decide issues unnecessary to the disposition of the case, especially given the numerous constitutional issues implicated in such an analysis.”
  • “Injuries remedied through (b)(2) actions are really group, as opposed to individual injuries.” (internal quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.