In Re S.R.A. and D.K.A. v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing Smiley, discussing deference to the agency and holding contrary to the agency's view
• declining to resolve how Chevron might apply because “the agency’s determination here cannot be upheld with or without deference”
• step two inquiry \depends on the nature and extent of the ambiguity\ identified in step one
• “Of course, what may be thought ambiguous in the first step of Chevron (and thus what may define a reasonable interpretation in step two
• step two inquiry “depends on the nature and extent of the ambiguity” identified in step one
• “[Section 5125(f)(1)] permit[s] states to impose their own fees ‘related to transporting hazardous material,’ but only ‘if the fee is fair and used for a purpose related to transporting hazardous material.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).