Skip to main content
· 10/7/2013

In re Squires

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 77
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 270
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3191
  • 571 U.S. 814
  • 2013 WL 1842083
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5202

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • governmental action must be “arbitrary, conscience-shocking, or oppressive in the constitutional sense, not merely incorrect or ill-advised,” to be actionable as a substantive due process violation
  • governmental action must be “arbitrary, conscience- shocking, or oppressive in the constitutional sense, not merely incorrect or ill-advised,” to be actionable as a substantive due process violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.