In re Spuyten Duyvil Road

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Judges in this District have repeatedly held that arguments may not be raised for the first time in a party's reply.\ (collecting cases)
• “Judges in this District have repeatedly held that arguments may not be raised for the first time in a party’s reply.”
• “Judges in this District have repeatedly held that arguments may not be raised for the first time in a party’s reply.” (collecting cases)
• \[Defendant] has cited no legal authority which establishes that [one factor] ... is dispositive of the joint employment question.\
• applying Browning-Ferris to resolve claim of joint employment
• applying Browning-Ferris to resolve claim of joint employment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).