In Re Splash Technology Holdings Inc. Securities Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 20 boilerplate allegations of defendants’ access to internal information, without particularized facts, 21 are insufficient to show scienter
• “[T]he Court finds no reason to consider the 12 [non-defendants’] sales in determining the scienter of the named defendants.”
• rejecting plaintiffs’ channel stuffing allegations as conclusory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).