In re Sperry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plan provision requiring a lender continue sending periodic mortgage loan statements to the debtor was appropriate
• \Form plans promote ease and efficiency for debtors' attorneys in preparing plans and for creditors and courts in reviewing them. Standardization helps reduce the costs of chapter 13 relief.\
• “[C]ourts have held that “non-standard” or additional plan terms should be kept to a minimum and when they are needed, debtors should identify the special circumstances necessitating the inclusion of such non-standard terms.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Parkman
  S.D. Mississippi· 2018-08-13· cited 5×
• In re Diaz
  W.D. Texas· 2018-05-14· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Payne v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (In Re Payne)
  D. Kansas· 2008-05-06· cited 28×
• Flynn v. Bankowski (Flynn)
  First Circuit· 2009-03-06· cited 26×
• Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. v. Herrera (In Re Herrera)
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-01-05· cited 19×
• In Re Monroy
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-06-20· cited 13×
• In Re Jackson
  N.D. Georgia· 2011-01-06· cited 5×
• In Re Solitro
  D. Massachusetts· 2008-02-07· cited 3×
• Ameriquest Mortgage Co. v. Nosek
  First Circuit· 2008-10-03· cited 1×