Skip to main content
· 3/28/1983

In Re Special Investigation No. 236

Citations

  • 458 A.2d 75
  • 295 Md. 573
  • 1983 Md. LEXIS 218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an appeal from the grant of a motion for the return of financial records from a grand jury constituted a final judgment for the same reasons
  • “even a change in the phraseology of a statute by a codification will not ordinarily modify the law unless the change is so material that the intention of the General Assembly to modify the law appears unmistakably from the language of the Code”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.