In Re Southern Star Foods, Inc., Debtor, State Insurance Fund v. Southern Star Foods, Inc. Kenneth G.M. Mather, Trustee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on H.R.Rep. No. 95-595, at 187, 357 (1978), reprinted in 1978 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5963, 6313 and S.Rep. No. 95-989, at 69 (1978), reprinted in 1978 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5787, 5855
• relying on H.R.Rep. No. 95-595, at 187, 357 (1978), reprinted in 1978 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5963, 6313 and S.Rep. No. 95-989, at 69 (1978), reprinted in 1978 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5787, 5855
• relying on H.R. Rep. No. 95-595, at 187, 357 (1978), reprinted in 1978 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5963, 6313 and S. Rep. No. 95-989, at 69 (1978), reprinted in 1978 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5787, 5855
• priority statutes must be read narrowly because “the overriding objective in bankruptcy cases is equal distribution of the debtor's limited resources among its creditors”
• “The split in the circuits is, in itself, evidence of the ambiguity of the phrase ‘contributions to an employee benefit plan’... .”
• priority statutes must be read narrowly because “the overriding objective in bankruptcy cases is equal distribution of the debtor's limited resources among its creditors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).