In Re Southeast Hotel Properties Limited Partnership

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the dominion and control test set forth in Bonded requires legal dominion and control”
• stating that the bankruptcy court’s factual findings are reviewed for clear error
• rejecting debtor’s con- tention that transactions were in \ordinary course of business\ because debtor failed to show they were common practice in industry or that creditors could reasonably expect them
• explaining how corporate principal “caused an employee . . . to create certain false documents to reflect the disbursement of $22,500 as refunds of guests’ deposits for group tours booked with [debtor hotel]” to hide skimming for personal gain
• an entity for whose benefit the transfer was made is essentially someone who receives a benefit but no money
• transferee “was placed on notice that the funds were drawn from a debtor’s accounts” since debtor was listed as remitter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).