In Re Soult

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the paramount policy being advanced by Rosinski and Stark is the bankruptcy debtor’s right to obtain a discharge of all pre-petition obligations not otherwise excepted by statute from the effect of the discharge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Mendiola
  N.D. Illinois· 1989-04-21· cited 100×
• In Re Crull
  W.D. Arkansas· 1989-06-07· cited 18×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Aida Lucilla Rosinski D/B/A New Caravan Garden Bar, Debtor. Aida Rosinski D/B/A New Caravan Garden Bar v. Willard Boyd
  Sixth Circuit· 1985-04-12· cited 202×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 1983-09-21· cited 33×
• In Re Harper
  S.D. Ohio· 1987-01-09· cited 6×