In re Soto

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, if the debtor satisfies section 362(l)(1), “the stay is re-imposed for thirty days to allow the debtor to cure the entire default and file a second certification that it has done so”
• describing Section 362(l)(1) as requiring, in part, actual payment by the debtor of the required rental deposit
• “Section 362(l) of the Code does not prevent the operation of Section 362(b)(22) where the judgment of possession is based on a non-monetary default.”
• Section 362(I) safe harbor is inapplicable if prepetition judgment for possession was based on a debtor’s non-monetary default

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Norwest Bank Worthington v. Ahlers
  Supreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 992×
• Housing Authority of Beaver County v. Alberts (In Re Alberts)
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-01-24· cited 20×
• In Re Griggsby
  S.D. New York· 2009-04-17· cited 12×
• In Re Harris
  E.D. New York· 2010-02-19· cited 9×
• In Re Williams
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-07-05· cited 8×
• In Re Smart World Technologies, Llc
  Second Circuit· 2005-09-12· cited 4×