Skip to main content
· 11/9/2007

In Re Solutia Inc.

Citations

  • 379 B.R. 473
  • 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 3921
  • 49 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 38
  • 2007 WL 3376900

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that upon acceleration by the lender, unless the parties agree otherwise, a prepayment consideration provision does not apply
  • noting that the automatic acceleration provision in a note indenture was “the result that [noteholders] bargained for”
  • holding the defeasance clause was irrelevant since the debtors were not seeking to effect defeasance
  • noting that “[i]t was entirely appropriate to provide for automatic acceleration in the Original Indenture since the giving of a notice of acceleration post-petition would violate the automatic stay”
  • “It was entirely appropriate to provide for automatic acceleration in the Original Indenture .... ”
  • “It was entirely appropriate to provide for automatic acceleration in the Original Indenture since the giving of a notice of acceleration postpetition would violate the automatic stay.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prudence Carter Beatty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.