· 11/9/2007
In Re Solutia Inc.
Citations
- 379 B.R. 473
- 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 3921
- 49 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 38
- 2007 WL 3376900
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that upon acceleration by the lender, unless the parties agree otherwise, a prepayment consideration provision does not apply
- noting that the automatic acceleration provision in a note indenture was “the result that [noteholders] bargained for”
- holding the defeasance clause was irrelevant since the debtors were not seeking to effect defeasance
- noting that “[i]t was entirely appropriate to provide for automatic acceleration in the Original Indenture since the giving of a notice of acceleration post-petition would violate the automatic stay”
- “It was entirely appropriate to provide for automatic acceleration in the Original Indenture .... ”
- “It was entirely appropriate to provide for automatic acceleration in the Original Indenture since the giving of a notice of acceleration postpetition would violate the automatic stay.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Prudence Carter Beatty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.