Supreme Court of Delaware· 10/26/2005
In re Solomon
Citations
- 886 A.2d 1266
- 2005 Del. LEXIS 415
- 2005 WL 2838175
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that if attorney who violated Rule 1.16(d) while on probation was permitted to retire she could return to active status without establishing her rehabilitation
- rejecting proposed sanction consisting of attorney’s retirement and agreement not to practice law for three years and instead suspending lawyer for three years
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berger, Holland, Jacobs, Ridgely, Steele
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re GreenSupreme Court of Delaware· 1983-07-26· cited 61×
- In Re BaileySupreme Court of Delaware· 2003-05-02· cited 44×
- In Re ReardonSupreme Court of Delaware· 2000-09-06· cited 36×
- In Re HullSupreme Court of Delaware· 2001-02-27· cited 12×
- In Re GarrettSupreme Court of Delaware· 2003-10-23· cited 11×
- In Re SolomonSupreme Court of Delaware· 1999-12-21· cited 8×
- In re SolomonSupreme Court of Delaware· 2005-03-01· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.