Skip to main content
· 2/5/1952

In re Solar Mfg. Corp.

Citations

  • 102 F. Supp. 859
  • 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4810

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • employer relying on a promise of a business agent which was inconsistent with the written terms of the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fake

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.