Skip to main content
· 3/8/1982

In Re Snider Bros., Inc.

Citations

  • 18 B.R. 230
  • 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 4636
  • 8 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1016

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • that objecting creditor \has looked solely to the credit of its debtor\ and \is certain to suffer more than minimal harm as a result of consolidation\ constitutes defense to substantive consolidation
  • that objecting creditor “has looked solely to the credit of its debtor” and “is certain to suffer more than minimal harm as a result of consolidation” constitutes defense to substantive consolidation
  • “[T]he fact that corporate formalities may have been ignored, or that different debtors are associated in business in some way, does not by itself lead inevitably to the conclusion that it would be inequitable to merge otherwise separate [entities]”.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paul W. Glennon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.