In re Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This circumvention of the forum defendant rule contravenes the drafters’ intent to avoid gamesmanship with the removal statute, and where such a 27 situation occurs, this Court cannot apply the plain language of the forum defendant rule to condone the removal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Corbitt v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 1978-12-11· cited 468×
• McPhaul v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1960-12-12· cited 133×
• American Tobacco Co. v. United States
  Sixth Circuit· 1945-03-26· cited 131×
• United States v. Milwaukee Refrigerator Transit Co.
  U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin· 1905-12-28· cited 118×
• Roy Orlen Hattaway v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 1962-06-06· cited 25×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Reid
  Supreme Court· 1852-02-18· cited 200×
• Commonwealth v. Moore
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1812-10-15· cited 9×
• Dyott v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1839-12-26· cited 7×