Skip to main content
Federal Circuit· 3/10/2016

In Re: Smith

Citations

  • 815 F.3d 816
  • 118 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1245
  • 2016 WL 909410
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 4431

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming 17 the Board’s finding that a “wagering game is, effectively, a method of exchanging and 18 resolving financial obligations based on probabilities created during the distribution of the 19 cards.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Hughes, Stoll

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.