Skip to main content
N.D. Ohio· 1/23/1985

In Re Smith

Citations

  • 47 B.R. 482
  • 40 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1067
  • 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 6862

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Although it was once held that the writing must contain some language which specifically conveys a security interest, ... this rule has since been discarded.”
  • this rule has since been discarded
  • financing statement, loan agreement, promissory note

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard L. Speer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.