Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 7/3/2008
In Re Smith
Citations
- 260 S.W.3d 568
- 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 4942
- 2008 WL 2611216
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying best-interest test after concluding parental presumption did not apply because child's managing conservators were grandfather and his wife, not child's parents
- applying best-interest test after concluding parental presumption did not apply because child’s managing conservators were grandfather and his wife, not child’s parents
- reviewing applicable standing provisions in Texas Family Code to determine whether purported father had standing
- applying best-interest test after concluding parental presumption did not apply where child's managing conservators were grandfather and his wife and grandmother sought access to and possession of child
- applying best- interest test after concluding parental presumption did not apply where child’s managing conservators were grandfather and his wife and grandmother sought access to and possession of child
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kem Thompson Frost
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Seureau v. ExxonMobil Corp.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2008-10-16· cited 109×
- in the Interest of R.T.K.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2010-11-02· cited 63×
- in the Interest of S.M.D., a ChildTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2010-02-24· cited 63×
- in the Interest of K.D.H., a ChildTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2014-04-03· cited 35×
- in Re J.W.L.Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2009-06-15· cited 32×
- in the Interest of B.G.D., A.J.D, and J.B.D., Minor ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-08-25· cited 20×
- In re B.D.S.D.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2009-06-18· cited 17×
- In re TinkerCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-12-13· cited 15×
- Rosscer Craig Tucker, II v. Lizabeth ThomasTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2011-12-20· cited 14×
- in Re: Charles Dwayne Lankford and Roberta GreshamCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2016-08-24· cited 10×
- in the Interest of R.C.T., L.J.T. and C.L.T.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-06-18· cited 6×
- in Re: H. R. L.Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2014-08-29· cited 6×
- Jeffery Janner and Meg Janner v. Kelsey A. RichardsonTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2013-08-29· cited 6×
- In re NelkeCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2019-04-05· cited 5×
- In Re RCTTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-06-18· cited 1×
- In Re SMDTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2010-06-02· cited 1×
- In Re JWLCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2009-06-15
- In Re RTKTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2010-11-02
- In Re BGDTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-08-25
- Rodney Smith v. Jill HawkinsTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2010-09-23
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court· 1992-05-07· cited 8,808×
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 6,943×
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court· 1993-05-05· cited 5,047×
- Gillespie v. GillespieTexas Supreme Court· 1982-11-03· cited 991×
- National Liability & Fire Insurance Co. v. AllenTexas Supreme Court· 2000-05-04· cited 670×
- Johnson v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court· 1989-06-28· cited 579×
- In the Interest of V.L.K.Texas Supreme Court· 2000-06-22· cited 474×
- Huie v. DeShazoTexas Supreme Court· 1996-06-28· cited 455×
- St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital v. AgborTexas Supreme Court· 1997-10-30· cited 424×
- In Re DerzapfTexas Supreme Court· 2007-03-23· cited 227×
- In Re AutoNation, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 2007-06-29· cited 136×
- In the Interest of SSJ-JTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2004-11-24· cited 103×
- In the Interest of WaltersTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2001-01-11· cited 102×
- In Re SullivanTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-02-24· cited 84×
- Taub v. Aquila Southwest Pipeline Corp.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-01-16· cited 72×
- in the Interest of M.N.G.Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2003-05-08· cited 57×
- in the Interest of C.M.C. and J.T.C., Minor ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2006-05-16· cited 57×
- In Re PensomTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2003-11-05· cited 42×
- Lilley v. LilleyTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2001-04-12· cited 40×
- Hobbs v. Van StavernTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-12-13· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.