N.D. Ohio· 5/12/1993
In Re Smith
Citations
- 157 B.R. 348
- 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 1133
- 1993 WL 310462
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing debtor’s $100.00 monthly telephone bill for debtor and spouse as “unduly high”
- substantial abuse indicated where the debtor's stated expenses included $175 being paid monthly on select dischargeable debts
- substantial abuse indicated where the debtor's stated expenses included $175 being paid monthly oh select dischargeable debts
- substantial abuse indicated where the debtor, and her non-debtor spouse, were supporting a family of four (with two minor children) on combined net monthly income of $3,645
- substantial abuse indicated where the debtor could pay her debts if her spouse’s net monthly income of $2,900 was taken into consideration along with her net monthly income of $854
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richard L. Speer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re GriffiethN.D. New York· 1996-05-17· cited 31×
- In Re MastromarinoD. Maine· 1996-06-11· cited 23×
- First Bank System, N.A. v. Begue (In Re Begue)N.D. Ohio· 1995-01-19· cited 23×
- In Re WilkinsonN.D. Ohio· 1994-04-19· cited 12×
- In Re MessengerN.D. Ohio· 1995-02-27· cited 10×
- In Re BrowneN.D. Ohio· 2000-10-03· cited 8×
- In Re BoatrightW.D. Missouri· 2009-09-02· cited 7×
- In Re WelchW.D. Michigan· 2006-08-04· cited 6×
- In Re SummerS.D. Ohio· 2000-11-22· cited 6×
- In Re BraithwaiteN.D. Ohio· 1996-02-15· cited 4×
- In Re FesslerN.D. Ohio· 1994-04-14· cited 4×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.