In Re Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A trial court abuses its discretion by entering a contempt judgment that is not supported by evidence, and such a judgment is void.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• in the Interest of W.L.D. and D.T.D., Children
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2014-05-15
• Richard Ritz v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2014-01-31
• in Re Gina P. Honermann-Garinger
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2010-11-17
• in Re Natural Soda, LLC
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2016-12-23

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Walker v. Packer
  Texas Supreme Court· 1992-05-07· cited 8,808×
• In Re Long
  Texas Supreme Court· 1999-01-07· cited 268×
• Deramus v. Thornton
  Texas Supreme Court· 1960-02-24· cited 122×
• Texas Animal Health Commission v. Nunley
  Texas Supreme Court· 1983-03-30· cited 87×
• Tracy v. Tracy
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2007-03-19· cited 56×
• In Re Zenergy, Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1997-12-11· cited 35×
• Ex Parte Busby
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1996-05-29· cited 29×
• Southwest Research Institute v. Keraplast Technologies, Ltd.
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2003-01-08· cited 13×
• Adams v. Bell
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2002-11-21· cited 9×
• Ex Parte Jones
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2000-12-21· cited 7×