Ohio Court of Appeals· 7/22/2022
In re S.M.
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 2516
Syllabus
The trial court deprived appellant of her right to allocution as set forth in Crim.R. 32(A)(1) when the court did not give her the opportunity to make a statement or to present information in mitigation of punishment at sentencing. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for a resentencing hearing that complies with Crim.R. 32(A)(1).
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court· 2000-12-20· cited 489×
- State v. ReynoldsOhio Supreme Court· 1998-01-14· cited 318×
- Hal Artz Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1986-12-19· cited 241×
- State v. Morris (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-11-20· cited 212×
- State v. Harris (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-01-22· cited 151×
- State v. FairclothOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-30· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.