Skip to main content

In re Skinner

Citations

  • 295 Ga. 217
  • 758 S.E.2d 788
  • 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 1354
  • 2014 WL 2022241
  • 2014 Ga. LEXIS 389

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the improper disclosure of confidential information did not “work[ ] or threaten[ ] substantial harm to the interests of the client”
  • public reprimand for attorney who violated Rules 1.4 and 1.6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.