Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/10/2019
In re S.K.
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 2278
Syllabus
The juvenile court did not err by granting permanent custody of appellants' nine respective children to a children services agency where the grant of permanent custody was in the children's best interest when considering appellants' unsteady and unstable housing, income, employment, and mental health issues.
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- In re C.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-14· cited 81×
- In re D.K.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-30· cited 80×
- In re G.F.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-16· cited 72×
- In re M.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-10· cited 64×
- In re K.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-19· cited 63×
- In re T.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-01-11· cited 62×
- In re S.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-22· cited 57×
- In re N.R.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-01-16· cited 48×
- In re D.E.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-20· cited 43×
- In re A.J.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-19· cited 33×
- In re J.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-30· cited 29×
- In re A.M.L.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-06-03· cited 18×
- In re J.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-12-17· cited 4×
- In re A.J.P.-H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-26· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.