Skip to main content
· 7/15/1891

In re Siering

Citations

  • 90 Cal. 207
  • 27 P. 204
  • 1891 Cal. LEXIS 913

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying plain error review where “record makes plain that the trial court did not make a ‘definitive ruling’ on the admissibility” of evidence “as contemplated in OCGA § 24-1-103(a)”
  • statements against interest generally have a sufficient guarantee of trustworthiness to be admissible under Rule 807
  • “if the trial court’s ruling is tentative or without prejudice, there is no definitive ruling on the objection”
  • evidence insufficient on financial transaction card fraud count

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.